CHL Standings 2010-11
2010-2011 Season
Allen Americans finished first in the 2010-11 CHL standings with 97 points. Rapid City Rush (84 points) and Colorado Eagles (84 points) followed.
2010-11 CHL Standings
| # | Team | GP | W | T | L | OTW | OTL | GF | GA | +/- | TP | PPG | Postseason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Conference | |||||||||||||
| 1. | Allen Americans | 66 | 47 | - | 16 | - | 3 | 271 | 211 | 60 | 97 | 1.47 | Conference Final loss |
| 2. | Bossier-Shreveport Mudbugs | 66 | 37 | - | 26 | - | 3 | 229 | 193 | 36 | 77 | 1.17 | Champion |
| 3. | Tulsa Oilers | 66 | 35 | - | 25 | - | 6 | 242 | 234 | 8 | 76 | 1.15 | Conference SF loss |
| 4. | Texas Brahmas | 66 | 34 | - | 27 | - | 5 | 227 | 228 | -1 | 73 | 1.11 | Conference QF loss |
| 5. | Odessa Jackalopes | 66 | 31 | - | 28 | - | 7 | 241 | 238 | 3 | 69 | 1.05 | Conference SF loss |
| 6. | Mississippi RiverKings | 66 | 30 | - | 31 | - | 5 | 199 | 229 | -30 | 65 | 0.98 | Conference QF loss |
| 7. | Arizona Sundogs | 66 | 25 | - | 31 | - | 10 | 204 | 253 | -49 | 60 | 0.91 | Conference QF loss |
| 8. | Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees | 66 | 25 | - | 35 | - | 6 | 194 | 232 | -38 | 56 | 0.85 | Conference QF loss |
| 9. | Laredo Bucks | 66 | 24 | - | 34 | - | 8 | 194 | 228 | -34 | 56 | 0.85 | Did not make playoffs |
| Turner Conference | |||||||||||||
| 1. | Rapid City Rush | 66 | 40 | - | 22 | - | 4 | 210 | 200 | 10 | 84 | 1.27 | Conference Final loss |
| 2. | Colorado Eagles | 66 | 40 | - | 22 | - | 4 | 250 | 199 | 51 | 84 | 1.27 | Final loss |
| 3. | Bloomington PrairieThunder | 66 | 37 | - | 22 | - | 7 | 188 | 189 | -1 | 81 | 1.23 | Conference QF loss |
| 4. | Missouri Mavericks | 66 | 37 | - | 23 | - | 6 | 213 | 173 | 40 | 80 | 1.21 | Conference SF loss |
| 5. | Wichita Thunder | 66 | 34 | - | 26 | - | 6 | 249 | 231 | 18 | 74 | 1.12 | Conference QF loss |
| 6. | Fort Wayne Komets | 66 | 31 | - | 27 | - | 8 | 187 | 204 | -17 | 70 | 1.06 | Conference SF loss |
| 7. | Quad City Mallards | 66 | 34 | - | 31 | - | 1 | 186 | 182 | 4 | 69 | 1.05 | Conference QF loss |
| 8. | Dayton Gems | 66 | 32 | - | 29 | - | 5 | 201 | 200 | 1 | 69 | 1.05 | Conference QF loss |
| 9. | Evansville Icemen | 66 | 21 | - | 32 | - | 13 | 181 | 242 | -61 | 55 | 0.83 | Did not make playoffs |