France (W) Standings 2001-02
2001-2002 Season
Cergy-Pontoise finished first in the 2001-02 France (W) standings with 24 points. Grenoble (15 points) and Font Romeu (14 points) followed.
2001-02 France (W) Standings
| # | Team | GP | W | T | L | OTW | OTL | GF | GA | +/- | TP | PPG | Postseason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nationale | |||||||||||||
| 1. | Cergy-Pontoise | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 139 | 9 | 130 | 24 | 2.00 | Champion |
| 2. | Grenoble | 12 | 8 | 0 | 4 | - | - | 66 | 44 | 22 | 15 | 1.25 | - |
| 3. | Font Romeu | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | - | - | 39 | 42 | -3 | 14 | 1.17 | - |
| 4. | Montpellier/Castres | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | - | - | 38 | 37 | 1 | 8 | 0.67 | - |
| 5. | Amiens | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | - | - | 36 | 95 | -59 | 6 | 0.50 | - |
| 6. | Angers | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | - | - | 31 | 63 | -32 | 5 | 0.42 | - |
| 7. | Gap | 12 | 1 | 2 | 9 | - | - | 16 | 75 | -59 | 4 | 0.33 | - |
| 8. | Caen | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Poule Alpes | |||||||||||||
| 1. | Grenoble | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | - | - | 24 | 11 | 13 | 6 | 1.50 | Final group |
| 2. | Gap | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | - | - | 5 | 16 | -11 | 2 | 0.67 | Final group |
| 3. | Val Vanoise | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | - | - | 9 | 11 | -2 | 2 | 0.67 | - |
| Poule Nord | |||||||||||||
| 1. | Cergy-Pontoise | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 147 | 2 | 145 | 12 | 2.00 | Final group |
| 2. | Amiens | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | - | - | 56 | 32 | 24 | 8 | 1.33 | Final group |
| 3. | Fontenay | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | - | - | 10 | 56 | -46 | 3 | 0.50 | - |
| 4. | Saint-Ouen | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | - | - | 3 | 126 | -123 | 0 | 0.00 | - |
| Poule Ouest | |||||||||||||
| 1. | Angers | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 36 | 5 | 31 | 8 | 2.00 | Final group |
| 2. | Caen | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | - | - | 13 | 24 | -11 | 2 | 0.50 | Final group |
| 3. | Bordeaux/Tours | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | - | - | 10 | 30 | -20 | - | - | - |
| Poule Sud | |||||||||||||
| 1. | Montpellier/Castres | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | - | - | 52 | 6 | 46 | 10 | 1.67 | Final group |
| 2. | Font Romeu | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | - | - | 54 | 9 | 45 | 10 | 1.67 | Final group |
| 3. | Toulouse-Blagnac | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | - | - | 15 | 34 | -19 | 4 | 0.67 | - |
| 4. | Aubagne | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | - | - | 6 | 78 | -72 | 0 | 0.00 | - |